◆ The only advisory practice focused exclusively on the organizational conflict that begins after a cyber incident is technically contained. ◆
Post-Incident Conflict Advisory

Organizations call us when the incident is technically contained, but leadership, governance, and trust are breaking down.

Traditional incident response restores systems.
We restore trust, governance, and organizational cohesion.

Submit a Confidential Inquiry Learn about our engagements
Beyond the Breach: Healing internal conflict after cyber incidents.
Beyond the Breach: Healing internal conflict after cyber incidents.
Briefing video: the post-incident second crisis and how CPCS stabilizes governance and executive decision making.
The crisis after the crisis: why organizational collapse begins after technical containment — and what to do about it.
CPCS Theory

The collapse follows a predictable sequence.

Click each node to explore the sequence. Identify where your organization is stuck and notice where traditional response stops.

How to Read This Model

  1. Follow the path forward from the incident
  2. Identify where your organization is stuck
  3. Notice where traditional response stops
Technical Incident Interpretive Fracture Narrative Divergence The Response GapThis is where technical response ends. Organizational collapse accelerates here. CPCS Intervention(Cyber-Phronesis)
Launch the Full Post-Incident Simulation →
Documented Cases

The organizational collapse after the breach.

These are real, publicly documented incidents. The breach in each case was contained. What follows is the organizational breakdown CPCS Theory was built to address.

Finance
Source
Why Us

We operate in the space traditional IR leaves behind.

Most cybersecurity firms help contain the technical event. CPCS Advisory addresses what often follows: leadership strain, governance confusion, competing narratives, and the internal conflict that can outlast the breach itself.

What Makes This Different
We do not replace incident response, legal counsel, or forensics.

We operate in the space those functions usually leave behind.

We focus on post-incident governance breakdown, not just technical remediation.
We address interpretive fracture, narrative divergence, and authority drift before they harden into long-term institutional damage.
We work at the intersection of cybersecurity, conflict resolution, governance, and executive decision support.
We help organizations move from blame and paralysis toward structured recovery and accountable action.

This is not generic cyber consulting. It is a specialized advisory model built for the second crisis that begins after the breach.

Why Us Video
A short overview of why CPCS Advisory exists.
What problem it solves, and why post-incident organizational conflict requires its own discipline.
Sectors Served

We work where the stakes are significant.

CPCS Advisory is selective about engagements. We focus on organizations where there is genuine commitment to understanding what happened and improving governance.

Higher EducationHealthcareState & Local GovernmentMid-Size EnterprisesLaw FirmsCyber InsurersFinancial InstitutionsCritical Infrastructure
The Founder

Dr. Larry Snyder

Founder · CPCS Advisory Group

Military Police Veteran · Fraud Investigator · Banking & Finance
20+ Years University Cybersecurity & Digital Forensics
TEDx Speaker · 2017: The Dark Side of Cybercrime
Expert Source · NBC, CBS, ABC & Regional Media 2013–2018
Founding Program Director · Bay Path MS in Cybersecurity
Full Biography →

"Failures rarely originate from a single bad actor or missing control. They emerge when judgment, authority, narrative, and incentives collide."

Across military, financial, academic, and cyber environments, one pattern remained consistent. Dr. Snyder's work is dedicated to identifying those collision points and designing governance systems that can absorb disruption without cascading into paralysis, blame cycles, or institutional damage.

Cyber Phronetic Conflict Advisory Group was founded to address what traditional incident response, legal review, and compliance frameworks consistently leave behind: the human and organizational conflict that persists after containment.

Begin Here

When an organization chooses to partner with us,
we are honored — and take that commitment very seriously.

We engage selectively. Organizations we work with share a genuine commitment to understanding what happened — not managing appearances. All inquiries are handled in confidence.

Submit a Confidential Inquiry Read the CPCS White Paper